| Yahoo! News |
| How to recreate body art, Coachella-style |
| Among the style statements inspiring Coachella envy across the web this past weekend were some of the particularly amazing body tattoos and makeup on show. From the whimsical to the geometric, face an |
| 2015-04-14T16:30:06+0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Celebrity tattoos and the danger of regret |
| What are these illustrated exhibitionists thinking? Lena Dunham’s body is a human canvas, scrawled with seven big and small tattoos, making her resemble a zaftig prison inmate. With an estimated... |
| 2015-04-13T06:22:42+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
Comments made by Mistie
<-back next->
1 to 11 of 11 comments
 |
Mistie |
2007-12-21 |
 |
| Looks more like an upside down Capricorn symbol. Why would you put something permanent on your skin without a professional's hand doing it? That's just stupid. |
|
Mistie |
2007-12-04 |
 |
| Yeah, I read two conflicting pieces of information AFTER I got it done, so I am going with the first piece of info which was on a site dedicated to the claddagh. Pointing away in my mind means my heart has been given away... To my husband. |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-10 |
 |
1) get a better artist
2) get the better artist to use a better black
3) get the better artist to use white ink on the white parts, will hurt like hell but would be worth it to make the tatt look better. |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| Not very original (seen things similar on every wall of every tattoo parlour I have looked at) but very nicely done. |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| Geez, I hope that is betadine and not pus! |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| That looks incredible, amazing detail! |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| Exquisite |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| I love the shading! Any copyright on that design? |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| Too hard to figure out what the fill design is. The outline design looks great though. |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| You need a better artist to fix the fill, you can see each fill attempt, it looks blotchy. Like a 6yo coloured it in. |
|
Mistie |
2007-11-08 |
 |
| I'd keep it simple and leave it as just the head, makes more of a statement that way. |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|
