 |
Shananana9 |
2011-09-20 |
| i think its a really cute idea, but i agree that the placement could have been better |
|
johnnystrong |
2010-06-11 |
| coming from an artist that was the worst location for a shitty tatto |
 |
BooBooKittyFuck |
2009-09-12 |
| you ruined your back for THAT? |
 |
Crustyfinch |
2008-09-02 |
| lol make sure you do what all men tell you! Or you will die!! ur a dick "shoe". I think its a very cool idea. I would still get it touched up though and personally I would add colour but I dont know if the print was black and white or not. |
|
bob |
2007-02-24 |
| Would look better elsewhere on the body I think. It's too small and plain for the back. |
 |
g.t.c |
2006-09-04 |
| that is sooo cute i love it |
|
LeiZero |
2006-07-23 |
| HUH? it's a very sweet, cute tattoo. gets an 8. I hate this whole idea that women have to get butterflies or hearts or something like that for it to be a good tattoo. I agree with zoepluto |
|
shoe |
2006-05-22 |
| You are truly stupid. You dont look very old and you have destroyed your body. You should have got somthing femanine and pretty. Maybe it can be covered with a real tattoo. |
 |
zoepluto |
2006-04-12 |
| Duh people. It's suppose to look like that! Some tattoos are based on other artwork so even if you don't like the style, that IS how it is meant to look. I love it! |
|
Raider505 |
2006-03-22 |
| The best part is she looks like she has a bangin body. The best thing about the tat is that it's on her back, so the less the people see it the less people suffer. |
 |
Pegasus |
2006-03-22 |
| this shit isnt even worth posting |
 |
mycatisnosferatu |
2006-02-17 |
| Maybe it’s supposed to look like that. |
|
sayaphsy |
2006-02-16 |
| CRAP! |
|
~GuErA~ |
2006-01-24 |
| LOOKS LIKE MY 5 YEAR OLD NEPHEW DREW IT! HAHAHAHAHAHAH |
|
lunabell |
2006-01-23 |
| so sad! |
