Yahoo! Answers |
|
|
Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
It's a home tattoo, (big mistake)
I just wanted to know if i over criticize it or it's really shit.
I have others professionally done, this one's getting fixed soon. I just want honest opinions fro |
2013-08-03T06:22:44+0000 |
|
Open Question: How bad does my tattoo look? |
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=izua37&s=5
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2w562vr&s=5
And in my Avi are the only ones where I can find a decent looking shot of it.
It says with hope comes faith, |
2013-08-03T06:18:04+0000 |
|
|
![]() |
<-back next->
1 to 13 of 13 comments
 |
AntR0we |
2009-11-22 |
ambigrams usually involve a bit of artistic license to help make them work but this just isn't right... The person who did it should be ashamed for taking your money |
 |
dbnova |
2009-03-26 |
The 'SON' looks like it can also be read as 'SOW'.
You shouldn't call your mother that. |
 |
Ink2thebone |
2009-03-26 |
needs a better pic, and the idea behind it is cool, doesn't belong in bottom 10 there's definitely worse ones |
 |
Daniel |
2009-03-15 |
That's Metal... LOL |
 |
----- |
2009-03-04 |
yes it does |
 |
Gaz Lee Crofts (Skin n Ink) |
2009-02-28 |
this doesnt belong in the bottom 10 |
 |
LadyHavoc |
2009-02-27 |
need much more to make this one work, but hey on the bright side...you beat "mythical crab" in the "wow this is shite" stakes ;)
well done |
 |
princesskg143 |
2009-02-27 |
its alright, it just makes the lettering look sloppy . |
 |
mandibunch |
2009-02-26 |
Great idea, but sometimes going to more than 1 artist for the design is a good idea. |
 |
BooBooKittyFuck |
2009-02-26 |
yeah, there's not much talent involved with this tat, is there? |
 |
Simon |
2009-02-26 |
Yes, ambigrams can be cool, but sorry, that one doesnt work!!! |
 |
stevie scott |
2009-02-26 |
this is one of the worst tattoos i have ever seen!! |
 |
Sashabeaumierleblanc |
2009-02-25 |
its an ambigram... but Iunno, It doesent work for me, I love the concept of getting an ambigram tattooed but it needs an idea behind it and maybe something more then just the word itself |
<-back next->
|
![]() |
|